SDDP Reinventing Democracy - Actions (European Initiative): Difference between revisions

From Reinvent Democracy
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 45: Line 45:


==Gallery==
==Gallery==
<gallery mode="packed-hover">
Image:Platres_Feb18_82.JPG
Image:Platres_Feb18_191.JPG
Image:Platres_Feb18_194.JPG
Image:Platres_Feb18_199.JPG
Image:Platres_Feb18_202.JPG
File:Press Release1.jpg
</gallery>


==Participants==
==Participants==

Revision as of 06:34, 16 May 2018

SDDP Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
SDDP Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
Report Title Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) Report
Triggering Question ""What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?""
Project Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF)
Author(s) Yiannis Laouris
Maria Georgiou
Andreas Andreou
Eleni Philippou
Nuri Silay
Andreas Shoshilos
Total Duration 737 person hrs
Statistics Participants=20
Number of ideas=71
Ideas received Votes=29
Ideas on MAP R=18
Spreadthink ST=36.4%
Dates 8 - 12 February 2016
Link European Initiative - Structured Democratic Dialogue Report



Executive Summary

This paper reports the results of the second of a series of workshops organized by Future Worlds Center under the auspices of UNDEF. The dialogue was implemented in the context of the Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) project. The purpose of this project was to bring together young people from all aroud the world in an attempt to take apart and reconstruct the concept of democracy. The workshop was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. This Co-Laboratoty was organized using the Structured Democratic Dialogue Process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. It is organized by European Initiative.



The Triggering Question (TQ) was
"What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?"

In response to the TQ, the 20 participants came up with 71 Actions. Following the voting process, 29 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.



Influence Map.
Influence tree from the Characteristics SDDP of the Reinventing Democracy workshop for TQ





According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were:

  • Action Plan 16: Ensuring that the right to information is a constitutional right
  • Action Plan 39: Online consultation portal for law proposals

Gallery

Participants

Name Country
Agnija Kazuša Latvia
Aida Bruni Italy
Aleksandra Ignatoski Croatia
Anastasiia Klymentenko Ukraine
Anna Routova Czech Republic
Fofana O.Kerfala France
Ion Muschei Romania
Jagoda Banach Poland
Jakub Gornicki Poland
Joanna Annion Estonia
Matus balaz Chech Republic
Nikitas Mahmudis Greece
Nikola Kostić Serbia
Nikola Pribisova Slovakia
Nuri Silay Cyprus
Stepan Kment Czech Republic
Viktoria Pomazova Ukraine
Vilma Qerama Albania
Vincent Chauvet France
Xhoni Gero Albania




























Final Report