SDDP Reinventing Democracy - Actions (European Initiative): Difference between revisions
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jordankent (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|editor= | |editor= | ||
|total_duration=737 person hrs | |total_duration=737 person hrs | ||
|stats=Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=71 | |stats=Participants=20 <br> Number of ideas=71<br> Ideas received Votes=29 <br> Ideas on MAP R=18 <br>Spreadthink ST=36.4% | ||
|dates= 8 - 12 February 2016 | |dates= 8 - 12 February 2016 | ||
|link=[http://www.futureworlds.eu/w/1/f/f2/RD_SDDP_European_Initiative_Report_v2.pdf European Initiative - Structured Democratic Dialogue Report] | |link=[http://www.futureworlds.eu/w/1/f/f2/RD_SDDP_European_Initiative_Report_v2.pdf European Initiative - Structured Democratic Dialogue Report] | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==Gallery== | ==Gallery== | ||
==Participants== | ==Participants== | ||
Revision as of 12:11, 15 May 2018
|
Executive Summary
This paper reports the results of the second of a series of workshops organized by Future Worlds Center under the auspices of UNDEF. The dialogue was implemented in the context of the Reinventing Democracy in the Digital Era (UNDEF) project. The purpose of this project was to bring together young people from all aroud the world in an attempt to take apart and reconstruct the concept of democracy. The workshop was organized using the structured dialogic design process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. This Co-Laboratoty was organized using the Structured Democratic Dialogue Process (SDDP) approach within the context of a rich web-based communication environment. It is organized by European Initiative.
The Triggering Question (TQ) was
"What concrete action, project or product would you propose to solve a particular shortcoming of current systems of governance?"
In response to the TQ, the 20 participants came up with 71 Actions. Following the voting process, 29 ideas received one or more votes and were structured to create the influence MAP shown below.
According to the participants of this workshop, appear to be the most influential were:
- Action Plan 16: Ensuring that the right to information is a constitutional right
- Action Plan 39: Online consultation portal for law proposals
Gallery
Participants
| Name | Country |
|---|---|
| Agnija Kazuša | Latvia |
| Aida Bruni | Italy |
| Aleksandra Ignatoski | Croatia |
| Anastasiia Klymentenko | Ukraine |
| Anna Routova | Czech Republic |
| Fofana O.Kerfala | France |
| Ion Muschei | Romania |
| Jagoda Banach | Poland |
| Jakub Gornicki | Poland |
| Joanna Annion | Estonia |
| Matus balaz | Chech Republic |
| Nikitas Mahmudis | Greece |
| Nikola Kostić | Serbia |
| Nikola Pribisova | Slovakia |
| Nuri Silay | Cyprus |
| Stepan Kment | Czech Republic |
| Viktoria Pomazova | Ukraine |
| Vilma Qerama | Albania |
| Vincent Chauvet | France |
| Xhoni Gero | Albania |